Skip to content

The Climate Exchange · Monaco

One world.One climate.One exchange.One future.

CLIMEX turns verified sovereign forest, peatland and taiga carbon into collateral you can hold, trade and retire. One token equals one tonne of CO₂e — and it is worth more standing than harvested.

Issued against Paris Article 6 · SEEA EA · GHG Protocol Land Sector

Modelled collateral base
$377B

Across 17 sovereign entries

Blended leverage
1.18x

Collateral per dollar of land acquired

Mapped land footprint
696.3M ha

Forest, peat, taiga and mangrove

Illustrative scenario

CLIMEX Valuation Model 2026 — not a quote, forecast or promise of collateral eligibility.

01 — The arbitrage

Wilderness is priced as dirt. It stores carbon.

Undeveloped interior land trades at extreme discounts — illiquid, inaccessible, zoned for nothing. Wrap the same coordinates in a sovereign lease and a decadal protection covenant, and the territory becomes high-density carbon storage collateral.

As real estate

Physical land value

Valued strictly as property, these critical biomes are worth almost nothing. Local monetisation options reduce to raw timber or agricultural conversion — both of which destroy the asset.

$45–$1,600/ ha

Portfolio acquisition cost

$319.1B

  • Systemic illiquidity
  • Zero accessibility
  • Regulatory zoning limits

Blended

1.18x

collateral value
per dollar of land

As natural capital

Sovereign biological asset value

The same hectares, held under a legal sovereign lease with decadal protection covenants, become certified, non-speculative collateral — and a leverage instrument for the state treasury.

$65–$2,080/ ha

Net risk-adjusted collateral

$377.1B

  • Registry-certified tonnes
  • Decadal covenant enforced
  • Retirement is irreversible

Ranges are the observed minimum and maximum across the 17 sovereign entries in the CLIMEX land ledger. Portfolio figures are the sum of hectares × the per-hectare rate for every entry.

02 — How it works

A closed loop from the forest floor to permanent retirement.

Landowners are paid to protect rather than to harvest. Verified tonnes enter CLIMEX as credits, leave as tokens, and are destroyed the moment a buyer redeems them.

Select a leg to isolate it.

Paid to creditPaid in tokenGets creditRedeemsSells creditGets tokenForest ownerVerifiedVerra · Gold Standard · Article 6Paid to protectCLIMEX1 token = 1 tonneBuyerRetired foreverExchangeToken ⇄ cashSeller

Instant

Settlement in seconds, not quarters.

Transparent

Every tonne traceable to its registry serial.

Fractional

Buy a kilogram or a megatonne.

24/7

The exchange never closes.

03 — The operating constitution

CLIMEX proposal

Fifteen pillars. Five domains. Three gates.

CLIMEX's own governance architecture — the checks a jurisdiction clears before any commercial workflow begins. No sovereign mandate, no participation; no valid sovereign decision, no commercial substitute for one.

Domain 1

Sovereignty

Mandate, territorial control and international alignment. No commercial workflow substitutes for a valid sovereign decision.

  • 01Sovereign mandate and voluntary participation
  • 02Territorial control and natural-capital rights
  • 03International alignment

Domain 2

Science

The registry, digital MRV and independent verification that carry an observation to a defensible claim.

  • 04National and global natural-capital registry
  • 05The Truth Layer: digital MRV
  • 06Scientific standards and independent verification

Observe → Calibrate → Quantify → Assure → Publish

Domain 3

Data

Provenance, traceability and interoperability. A number without lineage cannot support a decision.

  • 07Data integrity, traceability and interoperability

Domain 4

Integrity

Community rights, FPIC, benefit sharing and ecological safeguards as entry conditions, not post-transaction reporting.

  • 08Community rights, FPIC and benefit sharing
  • 09Ecological safeguards and long-term stewardship

Domain 5

Finance & legacy

Asset structuring, capital, settlement, risk, convening legitimacy and reinvestment for the generations that follow.

  • 10Sovereign asset structuring
  • 11Climate and nature finance infrastructure
  • 12Market, exchange and settlement mechanism
  • 13Governance, risk and anti-greenwashing
  • 14The Monaco institutional principle — proposed
  • 15Intergenerational prosperity and reinvestment

Every pillar resolves to

PassRemediateStop

— there is no fourth state, and no commercial workflow substitutes for a valid sovereign decision.

04 — Carbon atlas

Verified fact

A screening ledger, not a supply forecast.

Forest carbon as 236 countries and territories actually reported it, with their gaps preserved. A small number of sovereign holders dominate the register — which tells you where to open a conversation, and nothing at all about what can be issued.

Sources FAO FRA 2025FAO FRA data

Reported forest carbon by country · GtCO₂e

  • Russian Federation485.8
  • Brazil278.4
  • Canada276.6
  • United States250.7
  • DR Congo171.7
  • Australia71.2
  • China42.0
  • Indonesia40.9
  • Colombia36.0
  • Gabon32.0
  • Peru30.1
  • India27.6
  • Guyana26.7
  • Central African Republic24.2
  • Argentina22.4
  • Venezuela21.4
  • Mexico19.2
  • Finland18.2
  • Sweden15.6
  • Ethiopia15.2
  • Chile14.1
  • Bolivia14.0
  • Papua New Guinea13.8
  • New Zealand11.1
  • Congo11.1
  • Zambia10.7
  • Suriname9.9
  • Malaysia8.4
  • Germany8.2
  • Thailand7.7
  • Japan7.5
  • Mongolia7.5
  • Türkiye7.0
  • Ecuador6.4
  • France5.8
  • Tanzania5.7
  • Mozambique5.2
  • Nigeria5.2
  • Italy5.1
  • Myanmar5.0
  • Madagascar4.6
  • Angola4.3
  • United Kingdom4.0
  • Philippines3.9
  • Lao PDR3.6
  • South Africa3.4
  • Poland3.4
  • Ukraine3.1
  • Viet Nam2.9
  • Spain2.8
  • Republic of Korea2.2
  • Norway1.8
  • Cambodia1.4
  • DPR Korea1.4
  • Kazakhstan0.6
  • Greenland—

Pool completeness varies by country; a blank submission is a data gap, not a zero.

Largest reported stocks

  1. 01Russian Federation5/5485.8 GtCO₂e
  2. 02Brazil5/5278.4 GtCO₂e
  3. 03Canada5/5276.6 GtCO₂e
  4. 04United States5/5250.7 GtCO₂e
  5. 05DR Congo3/5171.7 GtCO₂e
  6. 06Australia5/571.2 GtCO₂e
  7. 07China3/542.0 GtCO₂e
  8. 08Indonesia2/540.9 GtCO₂e
  9. 09Colombia4/536.0 GtCO₂e
  10. 10Gabon5/532.0 GtCO₂e

Ranking by inventory stock is not ranking by investment quality or annual supply.

Scale

  • ≥ 200 GtCO₂e
  • 50 – 200 GtCO₂e
  • 10 – 50 GtCO₂e
  • 1 – 10 GtCO₂e
  • < 1 GtCO₂e
  • Data gap

Values are the sum of reported carbon pools at the reporting date — physical stock, not annual absorption. Pool completeness varies, so a country reporting two of five pools is not comparable to one reporting all five. A blank submission is a data gap, never a zero, and is never imputed. Mangrove area may already sit inside forest totals and is not added twice.

Sources FAO FRA 2025FAO FRA dataIPCC

05 — The typology method

Verified fact

Each ecosystem gets the unit its ecology supports.

There is no universal ecosystem cube. Forests report hectares and growing stock, peatlands report area times measured depth, mangroves report sediment cores. Where no authoritative global area exists, the ledger records that instead of estimating one.

Sources FAO FRA 2025UNEP peatlandsFAO mangrovesUNEP mangroves

Forests

Verified fact
4.14bn ha

Hectares, growing stock, carbon pools. Inventory screen only; a project outcome is still required.

Peatlands

Verified fact
487.75m ha

Hectares, depth, hydrology. Avoided emissions or restoration only.

Mangroves

Verified fact
14.8m ha

Hectares, biomass, sediment. Non-additive to forest totals.

Mineral soils

CLIMEX proposal
Site-defined

Hectares, layer, bulk density. Management-specific, repeated evidence.

Seagrass and salt marsh

Data gap
Not established

Mapped habitat, sediment. Country-scale data remains incomplete.

Open ocean

CLIMEX proposal
Excluded

Excluded. Excluded from the collateral screen entirely.

Bars sit on a log scale to keep smaller estates visible next to the global forest estate — they are not shares of one summed total, and several pools overlap (mangrove carbon may already sit inside forest totals and is not added twice).

06 — The macro valuation

Illustrative scenario

Modelled collateral base

$377B

The sum of every hectare in the CLIMEX land ledger at its modelled risk-adjusted collateral rate — 17 sovereign entries across four regions, consolidated into a single bio-infrastructure base.

CLIMEX Valuation Model 2026. Transparent assumptions for testing controls — not a quote, forecast, valuation opinion or promise of issuance, liquidity, price or collateral eligibility. National stock does not enter the finance formula.

Anchored in the Boreal

$294B of $377B

Canadian and Siberian taiga alone carry 78% of total platform collateral. Deep, cold, slow-cycling soil carbon is what gives the index its stability — tropical canopy supplies the growth, the Boreal supplies the ballast.

Sovereign entries

17

Regions consolidated into the screening ledger.

Real estate footprint

696.3M ha · 6.96M km²

Mapped on stable, surveyed land coordinates.

Acquisition cost basis

$319.1B

What the same coordinates cost as physical property.

Blended leverage

1.18x

Collateral value per dollar of land acquired.

07 — The finance waterfall

CLIMEX proposal

Value follows eligibility, not stock.

Collateral eligibility is a waterfall: every gate can reduce value or stop progression, and no later commercial step cures an earlier integrity failure. National carbon stock never enters at any gate.

Gate 1 — Inventory

Defined physical stock, boundary, typology and pools.

Gate 2 — Outcome

Additional, net, durable and safeguarded performance.

Gate 3 — Issued and legal

Verified registry state, title, authorisation, transferability and enforceability.

Gate 4 — Finance

Eligible tonnes × approved price basis × advance rate, net of buffers and concentration.

Worked example

Illustrative scenario
1.00 Mt issued→ less 20% buffer →0.80 Mt eligible→ @ $40/t →$32.0m reference exposure→ @ 50% advance →$16.0m finance value

A mid-range scenario for inspecting the model, not an asserted fair value, quote or forecast. Price ranges $15–$150/t and advance rates 25–75% by instrument, jurisdiction, quality, vintage and liquidity.

Instruments by stage

ReadinessGrant / technical assistanceInstitutional and data riskApproved workplan and deliverables
DevelopmentRecoverable grant / facilityPipeline and legal riskMilestones or later closing
DeliveryConcessional loan / guaranteeImplementation riskBudget, covenants and milestones
OutcomeResults-based paymentPerformance and verification riskVerified outcome
MarketOfftake / receivables financeBuyer and market riskDelivery of eligible units or payment claim

08 — The screening ledger

Illustrative scenario

Four regions. Seventeen sovereign entries.

A valuation model, not a collateral base. These roll-ups screen where a programme might be worth designing; they are not eligible tonnes, and national stock does not enter the finance formula. Per-country typology, managed size, land cost and modelled rates are released on request to institutional counterparties.

South America

5 entries

$13.6B

Modelled collateral

Managed size
160.3M ha
Acquisition cost
$26.6B
Leverage
0.51x

Amazon basin and montane rainforest. Land trades above collateral value — acquisition-led.

5 country rows released on request

Congo Basin

5 entries

$32.2B

Modelled collateral

Managed size
179.0M ha
Acquisition cost
$8.8B
Leverage
3.67x

Deepest peat carbon at the lowest land cost on the ledger. Strongest arbitrage in the portfolio.

5 country rows released on request

Southeast Asia

3 entries

$27.9B

Modelled collateral

Managed size
155.0M ha
Acquisition cost
$85.4B
Leverage
0.33x

High-depth peat and mangrove, but plantation-competitive land pricing compresses leverage.

3 country rows released on request

Boreal & Oceania

4 entries

$303.4B

Modelled collateral

Managed size
202.0M ha
Acquisition cost
$198.4B
Leverage
1.53x

Taiga soil carbon anchors four fifths of modelled collateral. The index's stability ballast.

4 country rows released on request

Request the screening ledger

All 17 sovereign entries with typology, managed size, per-hectare land cost, per-hectare modelled collateral and leverage multiplier.

We use these details only to review and respond to your request. Ledger access is released manually after review.

Portfolio total

Illustrative scenario
Modelled collateral$377.1B
Acquisition cost$319.1B
Managed size696.3M ha
Blended leverage1.18x

CLIMEX Valuation Model 2026. Transparent assumptions for testing controls — not quotes, forecasts, valuation opinions or a promise of issuance, liquidity, price or collateral eligibility.